Comments on: Nanny State

By: David

David — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 22:02:31 +0000

Thank-you big Dave for your … interesting posts.

By: Postman Pat

Postman Pat — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:24:29 +0000

I got a site that should replace “ba ba rainbow sheep,”

By: Big Dave

Big Dave — Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:22:05 +0000

I think right to intellectual intelligence should be banned; Alongside people that can’t punctuatate. Even if they (said people) can not spell slightly more than average words and tend to buy DELL products. Without reading any of their PURCHASE AGREEMENTS as the paper it was printed to does not exist within their law of persons origin. Isn’t the english language so random?

[H]ard [D]isk now weren’t they those big flat black things that were floppier than a floppy disk??

By: Ben Rogers

Ben Rogers — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:47:41 +0000

I think people shouldn’t group by nationality, they should group by intelligence…:p That way all the smart people could be anarchist and it would be good.

By: Antony

Antony — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:39:11 +0000

I don’t actually agree with the idea of lowering the drinking age to 16 because its just too young an age to be drinking, the UK already has a bad enough problem with obese children, and from how easy it already is for people under the age of 18 to get alcohol, making it any easier would just end up in the UK having a problem with alcoholic teenagers as well.
I know from experience with my younger sister, she’s just turned 17 and her idea of a good night for the past 12-18months has been spending her night at a mates, getting totally pissed, just about making it home before she passes out – this being at 2-3am in the morning, her then having a hangover and not going to college, if anything what is needed is tighter regulations to stop people under the age of 18 being able to buy alcohol.

As for drugs, wouldn’t making them legal, even with the high price, just mean that more people would get access to drugs, therefore more people getting addicted and having to get bigger and bigger amounts each time, getting into debt to fund their habit, and then in some extreme cases eventually turning to crime to keep it funded?
I know thatâ€™s kind of looking at the extreme negative side of it – but it is entirely possible, more so if the drugs are a lot more potent because they arenâ€™t being mixed with god knows what substances and are produced in a sanctioned lab environment rather than some make-shift lab in the back room of a seedy motel?

As for smoking, I say ban it everywhere, its the second most disgusting habit ever, you only have to be near someone smoking for a matter of moments, and your clothes, hair everything stink of smoke. The first most disgusting habit is the cretins that think its OK to spit on the floor as they are walking down the street!

Incidentally, why do you think that the driving age limit should be raised to 21?

By: Ben Rogers

Ben Rogers — Sun, 02 Apr 2006 15:31:57 +0000

Yes. I could be from 0 to 60, big boy. *wink* *pelvic thrust*

By: David

David — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 17:30:52 +0000

Could you be more homosexual right now?

By: Ben Rogers

Ben Rogers — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 17:22:42 +0000

Biggest pile of bollocks aside from Chuck Norris’, that is.

By: David

David — Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:23:39 +0000

Please don’t get me started about religion, that’s the biggest pile of sweaty bollocks ever conceived.

By: Ben Rogers

Ben Rogers — Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:18:39 +0000

I agree to what you’re saying, but I just don’t think it would work out. People would be all OMG DRUGS R LIEK BAD HURRRRR” And then you’d explain your reasoning and they’d be all like “HURRR HURRR HURRR” *jesusplode* … yeah. I agree with you, overall. People should choose what they want to do with their husk, and if they choose to rot the fucker, all power to ‘em.

Anarchy for the UK? :p